Buy on Amazon
£29
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1677 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - £29.0 vs £46.22
- Up to 32% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-7100 - £0.17 vs £0.25 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3470S - 184 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470S - 51 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
171
92.93478260869566%
Value, £/FPS
£0.17/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-3470S - i5-3470S
Buy for £29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3037 minutes ago
Intel Core I3-7100 3.90 GHz CPU - Black
Buy for £46.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3038 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i3-7100
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
604
48.43624699278268%
Multi-Core
1724
70.65573770491802%
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
