Buy on Amazon
£89
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $184
Availability
MSRP in USD: $184
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3470 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3470 is 185 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Performs up to 3% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G1610 - 101 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i5-3470 - £5.56 vs £89.0
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 55 vs 77 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core I5-3470 Processor (3.20GHZ, 6MB Cache, Socket 1155)
Buy for £89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76548 minutes ago
BQTEC Intel Celeron G1610 2.60 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 2 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processor LGA 1155
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76548 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-3470
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
68.48874598070739%
Multi-Core
739
40.16304347826087%
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 77 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
