Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3470 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3470 is 332 days older than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6350 - 171 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i5-3470 - £52.95 vs £63.11
- Up to 14% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3470 - £0.32 vs £0.37 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 6 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £63.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13161 minutes ago
Buy for £52.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |