Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms Core i5-3360M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 3869 days newer than Core i5-3360M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3360M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-3360M - 193 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3360M - 24 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-3360M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i7-13700F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3360M | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
