Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i5-3360M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2592 days newer than Core i5-3360M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3360M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3360M - 125 vs 116 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3360M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3360M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
515
48.954372623574145%
Multi-Core
1106
36.707600398274145%
Intel Core i5-3360M | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
