Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600 outperforms Core i5-3340M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14600 is 4024 days newer than Core i5-3340M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600
- Performs up to 35% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3340M - 157 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3340M - 20 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3340M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Core i5-14600
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3340M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
523
19.478584729981378%
Multi-Core
1054
7.834101382488479%
Intel Core i5-3340M | vs | Intel Core i5-14600 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
