Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Core i5-3340M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is 3859 days newer than Core i5-3340M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3340M
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
- Performs up to 36% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3340M - 158 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3340M - 32 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3340M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
Mobile • Jul 27th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3340M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
523
18.565850195243165%
Multi-Core
1054
6.393691234455566%
Intel Core i5-3340M | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2023 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
