Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3340M outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3340M is 118 days older than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3340M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-3340M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3340M | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
