Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Core i5-3320M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 1126 days newer than Core i5-3320M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3320M
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 35 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-3320M - 175 vs 167 FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
175
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.79/FPS
100%
Price, £
£138.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13326 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3320M | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 91 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |