Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690K outperforms Core i5-3320M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4690K is 731 days newer than Core i5-3320M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3320M
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 35 vs 88 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3320M - 129 vs 116 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3320M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i5-4690K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3320M | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 88 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
