Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Core i5-3317U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2890 days newer than Core i5-3317U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3317U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3317U - 122 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3317U - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.84/FPS
100%
Price, £
£224.84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £224.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19410 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3317U | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |