Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i5-3317U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2315 days newer than Core i5-3317U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3317U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 8% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-3317U - 293 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3317U - 24 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £437.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65396 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
398
31.240188383045524%
Multi-Core
799
10.719077005634558%
Intel Core i5-3317U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |