Buy on Amazon
£339.98
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $449
Availability
MSRP in USD: $449
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core i5-3317U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3869 days newer than Core i5-3317U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3317U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 17 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 67% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-3317U - 731 vs 438 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3317U - 16 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
731
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.47/FPS
100%
Price, £
£339.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Desk-top Processor (8-core/16-thread, 104MB cache, up to 5.0 GHz max boost)
Buy for £339.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3317U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3317U | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i5-3317U or Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
534 FPS
£3.37/FPS
GeForce RTX 4070
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
32 GB, 2 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
£1,798.98
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
