Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Core i5-3230M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3556 days newer than Core i5-3230M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3230M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-3230M - 263 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3230M - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
263
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.88/FPS
100%
Price, £
£495.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £495.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3230M | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |