Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Core i5-2537M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 671 days newer than Core i5-2537M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2537M
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 17 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Core i5-2537M - 672 vs 667 FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2537M | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
2.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |