Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms Core i5-2520M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 4724 days newer than Core i5-2520M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2520M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 26% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-2520M - 212 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2520M - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
212
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£108.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £108.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13635 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2520M | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |