Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - £37.72 vs £399.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - £0.32 vs £2.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 29% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-2500K - 154 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 24 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
119
77%
Value, £/FPS
£0.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£37.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £37.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13818 minutes ago
Buy for £399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13818 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |