Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500 outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2500 is 841 days older than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than FX-4350 - 169 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-2500
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
