Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-13100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-13100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 286 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-13100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 5% better in God of War than Core i3-13100F - 196 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - £111.37 vs £284.99
- Up to 59% better value when playing God of War than Core i5-14600K - £0.6 vs £1.45 per FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
196
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.45/FPS
41%
Price, £
£284.99
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for £284.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
187
95%
Value, £/FPS
£0.6/FPS
100%
Price, £
£111.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £111.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14600K | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |