Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 3112 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-6600K - 198 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - £138.88 vs £195.59
- Up to 20% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-14400F - £0.79 vs £0.99 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
198
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.99/FPS
79%
Price, £
£195.59
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for £195.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
175
88%
Value, £/FPS
£0.79/FPS
100%
Price, £
£138.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 91 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |