Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600 is 713 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i5-12600 - £212.71 vs £257.21
- Up to 16% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-12600 - £0.43 vs £0.51 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Performs up to 1% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-14400F - 500 vs 497 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
497
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.43/FPS
100%
Price, £
£212.71
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £212.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
500
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.51/FPS
84%
Price, £
£257.21
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for £257.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i5-12600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |