Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-14400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1505 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 150 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - £200.04 vs £1861.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - £1.33 vs £13.89 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 64 vs 16 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
150
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£200.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £200.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
Buy for £1,861 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 32 |
16 | Threads | 64 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |