Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 38% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Pentium G4400 - 130 vs 94 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - £101.7 vs £200.38
- Up to 30% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-13600K - £1.08 vs £1.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
130
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.54/FPS
70.12987012987013%
Price, £
£200.38
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for £200.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1607 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
94
72.3076923076923%
Value, £/FPS
£1.08/FPS
100%
Price, £
£101.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £101.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1607 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
694
26.04127579737336%
Multi-Core
1184
7.974137931034483%
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |