Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 468 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-13600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £284.41 vs £519.36
- Up to 43% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i9-14900F - £1.41 vs £2.48 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i5-13600K - 209 vs 201 FPS
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
201
96%
Value, £/FPS
£1.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£284.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £284.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
209
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.48/FPS
56%
Price, £
£519.36
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for £519.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |