Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 22% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-7400 - 206 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - £152.25 vs £200.38
- Up to 7% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-13600K - £0.9 vs £0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
206
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.97/FPS
92.78350515463917%
Price, £
£200.38
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for £200.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
169
82.03883495145631%
Value, £/FPS
£0.9/FPS
100%
Price, £
£152.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £152.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1176
44.127579737335836%
Multi-Core
3232
21.767241379310345%
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |