Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-14100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-14100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 468 days older than the cheaper Core i3-14100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-14100F - 157 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - £108.97 vs £283.41
- Up to 61% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-13600K - £0.71 vs £1.81 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
157
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.81/FPS
39%
Price, £
£283.41
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for £283.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
153
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.71/FPS
100%
Price, £
£108.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £108.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |