Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13500 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13500 is 2134 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 17% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 1700 - 209 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 1700 - £1.09 vs £1.1 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i5-13500 - £196.62 vs £227.97
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
209
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.09/FPS
100%
Price, £
£227.97
86%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £227.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3955 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
178
85.16746411483254%
Value, £/FPS
£1.1/FPS
99.09090909090908%
Price, £
£196.62
100%
Buy for £196.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3956 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Single-Core
1005
41.8227215980025%
Multi-Core
5100
41.308925967924836%
Intel Core i5-13500 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |