Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i9-9900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1538 days newer than Core i9-9900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9900X - 148 vs 133 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for £159.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74636 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1488
64.97816593886463%
Multi-Core
9516
88.56212191717077%
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 165 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |