Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-10900 - 243 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - £172.2 vs £276.12
- Up to 42% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-10900 - £0.71 vs £1.23 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
243
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.71/FPS
100%
Price, £
£172.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £172.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
Buy for £276.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |