Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600 is 344 days older than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i5-12600 - £168.97 vs £257.21
- Up to 33% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-12600 - £0.87 vs £1.3 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-13400F - 198 vs 195 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
195
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.87/FPS
100%
Price, £
£168.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £168.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Buy for £257.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i5-12600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |