Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11500.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Rocket League than Core i5-11500 - 765 vs 748 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11500 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - £139.1 vs £168.97
- Up to 14% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i5-13400F - £0.19 vs £0.22 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
765
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.22/FPS
86%
Price, £
£168.97
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for £168.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
748
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£139.1
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £139.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |