Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 16% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-2600K - 182 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - £118.88 vs £203.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-13400 - £0.76 vs £1.12 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for £203 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
157
86%
Value, £/FPS
£0.76/FPS
100%
Price, £
£118.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £118.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |