Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 3360 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 15% better in Apex Legends than FX-4300 - 294 vs 256 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-12500 - £24.62 vs £180.59
- Up to 84% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i5-12500 - £0.1 vs £0.61 per FPS
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £180.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
Buy for £24.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12500 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |