Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 9 3900XT on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400F is 546 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 9 3900XT.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 16% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 3900XT - 474 vs 409 FPS
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - £113.0 vs £499.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 3900XT - £0.24 vs £1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
474
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.24/FPS
100%
Price, £
£113
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
Buy for £499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |