Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 532 days newer than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 146 vs 132 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-12400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Single-Core
1452
66.27110908261068%
Multi-Core
4669
52.40179573512906%
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
