Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 771 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 17% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 230 vs 196 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - £1250.0 vs £2445.47
- Up to 40% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-12400 - £6.38 vs £10.63 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 48 vs 12 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
230
100%
Value, £/FPS
£10.63/FPS
60%
Price, £
£2445.47
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for £2,445.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
196
85%
Value, £/FPS
£6.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1250
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £1,250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 48 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |