Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3417 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than FX-4130 - 205 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 99% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - £16.87 vs £2511.32
- Up to 99% better value when playing Control than Core i5-12400 - £0.08 vs £12.25 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £2,511.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Buy for £16.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |