Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £160.16 vs £519.36
- Up to 67% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-14900F - £0.51 vs £1.54 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 8% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-11600KF - 337 vs 313 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 32 vs 12 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
313
92%
Value, £/FPS
£0.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£160.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £160.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
337
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.54/FPS
33%
Price, £
£519.36
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for £519.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |