Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - £179.9 vs £359.99
- Up to 48% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-14700F - £1.27 vs £2.43 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11600KF - 148 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 28 vs 12 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
95%
Value, £/FPS
£1.27/FPS
100%
Price, £
£179.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £179.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18732 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
148
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.43/FPS
52%
Price, £
£359.99
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for £359.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18732 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 20 |
12 | Threads | 28 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |