Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 294 days older than the cheaper Core i3-12100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-12100 - 265 vs 264 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - £98.97 vs £169.99
- Up to 42% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-11600K - £0.37 vs £0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 60 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
265
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.64/FPS
57%
Price, £
£169.99
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for £169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15639 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
264
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £98.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15639 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i3-12100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |