Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2878 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 33% better in World of Warcraft than FX-4350 - 206 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - £59.97 vs £241.62
- Up to 67% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-11600 - £0.39 vs £1.17 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
206
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.17/FPS
33%
Price, £
£241.62
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for £241.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |