Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Core i5-11260H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 120 days newer than Core i5-11260H.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-11260H - 149 vs 138 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11260H - 16 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-11260H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11260H | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
