Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF and the more expensive Core i9-10900F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 0% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10900F - 403 vs 402 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - £137.14 vs £325.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10900F - £0.34 vs £0.81 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 20 vs 12 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
403
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.34/FPS
100%
Price, £
£137.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £137.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12869 minutes ago
Buy for £325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12869 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |