Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600K is 373 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9900 - 193 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - £162.0 vs £558.88
- Up to 71% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9900 - £0.84 vs £2.93 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 16 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.84/FPS
100%
Price, £
£162
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £162 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Buy for £558.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |