Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 22% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1840 - 111 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - £49.95 vs £158.88
- Up to 62% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-10600K - £0.55 vs £1.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 53 vs 95 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
111
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.43/FPS
38%
Price, £
£158.88
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for £158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 437 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
91
81%
Value, £/FPS
£0.55/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 436 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |