Buy on Amazon
£238.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $699
Availability
MSRP in USD: $699
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 987 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £238.88 vs £579.98
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 13% better in Rocket League than Core i5-10600 - 818 vs 725 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Intel® Core™ i5-10600 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for £238.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75172 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i9-13900KS, 24 (8p+16e) Cores, 32 Threads, 32 MB Cache
Buy for £579.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i5-10600
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10600
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1579
50.85346215780998%
Multi-Core
6175
28.282874547703017%
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
