Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14650HX outperforms Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14650HX is 1348 days newer than Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14650HX
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10400F - 153 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
86.27450980392157%
Value, £/FPS
£0.77/FPS
100%
Price, £
£101.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £101.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61753 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
56.837944664031625%
Multi-Core
5751
40.242110419144915%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i7-14650HX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |