Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - £101.31 vs £135.99
- Up to 18% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-11500 - £0.55 vs £0.67 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Warcraft than Core i5-10400F - 202 vs 184 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
184
91%
Value, £/FPS
£0.55/FPS
100%
Price, £
£101.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £101.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
202
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.67/FPS
82%
Price, £
£135.99
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for £135.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |