Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 157 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - £98.8 vs £2100.0
- Up to 95% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - £0.38 vs £8.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-10400F - 260 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 64 vs 12 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
257
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £98.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
260
100%
Value, £/FPS
£8.08/FPS
4%
Price, £
£2100
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for £2,100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |