Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2558 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 12% better in No Man's Sky than FX-6350 - 176 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - £39.99 vs £101.05
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £101.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75068 minutes ago
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75067 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |